https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768639 Recovery of budgetary support granted under a scheme for change in ownership could not be sustained where a later Division Bench ruling had already decided the same entitlement issue. The High Court treated that appellate judgment as binding and held that a proposed special leave petition did not affect its present force. The impugned recovery order was therefore set aside, and relief was granted in line with the binding appellate ruling, while other questions were left open. en-us Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Apr 2025 10:15:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768639 Recovery of budgetary support granted under a scheme for change in ownership could not be sustained where a later Division Bench ruling had already decided the same entitlement issue. The High Court treated that appellate judgment as binding and held that a proposed special leave petition did not affect its present force. The impugned recovery order was therefore set aside, and relief was granted in line with the binding appellate ruling, while other questions were left open. Case-Laws GST Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768639