https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768640 The Madras HC held that the petitioner was not foreclosed from responding to the show cause notice merely because a reply to the draft audit report had not been filed before the draft was prepared. The petitioner was permitted to raise all grievances before the adjudicating authority, which was directed to consider the reply independently on merits and in accordance with law after granting sufficient opportunity. The writ petitions were disposed of by allowing liberty to file a reply to the show cause notice and requiring fresh consideration of that reply on merits. en-us Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2025 21:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768640 The Madras HC held that the petitioner was not foreclosed from responding to the show cause notice merely because a reply to the draft audit report had not been filed before the draft was prepared. The petitioner was permitted to raise all grievances before the adjudicating authority, which was directed to consider the reply independently on merits and in accordance with law after granting sufficient opportunity. The writ petitions were disposed of by allowing liberty to file a reply to the show cause notice and requiring fresh consideration of that reply on merits. Case-Laws GST Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768640