<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 558 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768644</link>
    <description>The HC upheld a tax authority&#039;s order imposing tax, penalty, and interest under the GST Act. The court found the notice adequately specified discrepancies and potential penalties, and the authority was justified in passing the order due to the taxpayer&#039;s failure to respond to multiple notices. The petition challenging the order was dismissed, confirming the tax authority&#039;s procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 558 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768644</link>
      <description>The HC upheld a tax authority&#039;s order imposing tax, penalty, and interest under the GST Act. The court found the notice adequately specified discrepancies and potential penalties, and the authority was justified in passing the order due to the taxpayer&#039;s failure to respond to multiple notices. The petition challenging the order was dismissed, confirming the tax authority&#039;s procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>