https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768645 HC found that Respondent No. 2 improperly dismissed Petitioner's appeal by failing to consider submitted authorization evidence. The court set aside the original dismissal order, emphasizing procedural fairness and principles of natural justice. HC directed a fresh hearing of the appeal, mandating Respondent No. 2 to provide fair opportunity for document submission and complete the process by 30.06.2025. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2025 19:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768645 HC found that Respondent No. 2 improperly dismissed Petitioner's appeal by failing to consider submitted authorization evidence. The court set aside the original dismissal order, emphasizing procedural fairness and principles of natural justice. HC directed a fresh hearing of the appeal, mandating Respondent No. 2 to provide fair opportunity for document submission and complete the process by 30.06.2025. Case-Laws GST Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768645