https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42792 Writ jurisdiction may be exercised despite an alternative statutory remedy where the challenge is to a patently erroneous tariff classification order said to disregard binding decisions and rest on an incorrect interpretation of the tariff. On classification, HDPE tapes, HDPE fabrics and HDPE woven sacks made from HDPE plastic granules were held to be plastic products under Chapter 39, because width alone does not determine classification under Heading 54.06 unless the goods are also synthetic textile material. The goods were directed to be classified under Heading 39.20/3920.32 and Heading 39.23/3923.90, not under Chapter 54. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42792 Writ jurisdiction may be exercised despite an alternative statutory remedy where the challenge is to a patently erroneous tariff classification order said to disregard binding decisions and rest on an incorrect interpretation of the tariff. On classification, HDPE tapes, HDPE fabrics and HDPE woven sacks made from HDPE plastic granules were held to be plastic products under Chapter 39, because width alone does not determine classification under Heading 54.06 unless the goods are also synthetic textile material. The goods were directed to be classified under Heading 39.20/3920.32 and Heading 39.23/3923.90, not under Chapter 54. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42792