https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461492 A specific review period under the Tribunal's procedural rules could not be extended by Section 5 of the Limitation Act where the rules themselves prescribed the time and manner for review, so the belated review was not entertainable. On seniority, later appointees could not be placed above 1985 appointees on alleged comparative merit because there was no common panel, no reliable marks data, and the earlier appointees had not been heard. In the absence of a proved common merit list or comparable record, seniority was confined to actual dates of joining service. en-us Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Apr 2025 16:29:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461492 A specific review period under the Tribunal's procedural rules could not be extended by Section 5 of the Limitation Act where the rules themselves prescribed the time and manner for review, so the belated review was not entertainable. On seniority, later appointees could not be placed above 1985 appointees on alleged comparative merit because there was no common panel, no reliable marks data, and the earlier appointees had not been heard. In the absence of a proved common merit list or comparable record, seniority was confined to actual dates of joining service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461492