https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42772 The court ruled that the petitioner's application under Article 32 was not maintainable in the case regarding the interpretation of Section 15(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The court emphasized that fundamental rights under Article 32 do not extend to clearing imported goods without paying customs duties as required by law. The court highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory procedures for determining duty rates and compliance with customs regulations. The writ petition was disposed of, allowing revenue authorities to take necessary action for dues recovery in compliance with the law. en-us Mon, 06 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42772 The court ruled that the petitioner's application under Article 32 was not maintainable in the case regarding the interpretation of Section 15(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The court emphasized that fundamental rights under Article 32 do not extend to clearing imported goods without paying customs duties as required by law. The court highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory procedures for determining duty rates and compliance with customs regulations. The writ petition was disposed of, allowing revenue authorities to take necessary action for dues recovery in compliance with the law. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42772