<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 680 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461489</link>
    <description>Immunity under the Remittances of Foreign Exchange and Investment in Foreign Exchange Bonds (Immunities and Exemptions) Act, 1991 applies only where the receipt is a protected remittance within Section 2(b) and the recipient falls within the protected class. The bar on inquiry or investigation is therefore not absolute: the Enforcement Directorate may conduct a preliminary inquiry to determine whether the transaction answers the statutory definition of remittance. If the material suggests a prima facie violation of foreign exchange law, that material can support further inquiry, and if the amount is found not to be protected remittance, investigation is not barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 11:30:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 680 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461489</link>
      <description>Immunity under the Remittances of Foreign Exchange and Investment in Foreign Exchange Bonds (Immunities and Exemptions) Act, 1991 applies only where the receipt is a protected remittance within Section 2(b) and the recipient falls within the protected class. The bar on inquiry or investigation is therefore not absolute: the Enforcement Directorate may conduct a preliminary inquiry to determine whether the transaction answers the statutory definition of remittance. If the material suggests a prima facie violation of foreign exchange law, that material can support further inquiry, and if the amount is found not to be protected remittance, investigation is not barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>