https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461488 A broadcaster's duty under Clause 3.2 of the 2004 Interconnection Regulations to supply signals on non-discriminatory terms does not apply where the distributor is in payment default. The parties' agreement also limited the petitioner's operating area and barred expansion beyond that area without written consent. Because the challenge turned on disputed factual questions about default, area expansion, and supply to local cable operators, the writ court would not resolve them at the interim stage. The Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief against disconnection of signals was therefore not interfered with. en-us Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Apr 2025 11:30:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461488 A broadcaster's duty under Clause 3.2 of the 2004 Interconnection Regulations to supply signals on non-discriminatory terms does not apply where the distributor is in payment default. The parties' agreement also limited the petitioner's operating area and barred expansion beyond that area without written consent. Because the challenge turned on disputed factual questions about default, area expansion, and supply to local cable operators, the writ court would not resolve them at the interim stage. The Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief against disconnection of signals was therefore not interfered with. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461488