<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (8) TMI 65 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42768</link>
    <description>Binding administrative circulars governing duty liability must be applied according to their true scope. The Bombay HC noted that the CBEC circular contemplated provisional duty-free clearance for electronic components capable of multiple uses, subject to later verification of actual use. As the importer had brought the silicon rectifiers under an actual user licence for manufacture of electronic flash guns, the authorities misread the circular and wrongly denied provisional treatment. The orders were therefore found perverse and unsustainable, and the duty already collected was held refundable, with belated verification after a long lapse of time serving no useful purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:48:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (8) TMI 65 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42768</link>
      <description>Binding administrative circulars governing duty liability must be applied according to their true scope. The Bombay HC noted that the CBEC circular contemplated provisional duty-free clearance for electronic components capable of multiple uses, subject to later verification of actual use. As the importer had brought the silicon rectifiers under an actual user licence for manufacture of electronic flash guns, the authorities misread the circular and wrongly denied provisional treatment. The orders were therefore found perverse and unsustainable, and the duty already collected was held refundable, with belated verification after a long lapse of time serving no useful purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>