https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87290 HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, holding that the rejection of Rs. 2,195/- by the respondent was improper and contrary to the budgetary support scheme notification. The court determined that the petitioner was entitled to budgetary support calculated at 58% of central tax paid through cash ledger and 29% of IGST paid, after input tax credit utilization. The HC directed the respondent to release the inadmissible amount for the quarter January 2022 to March 2022, finding no justification for the partial claim rejection. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:31 +0530 Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87290 HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, holding that the rejection of Rs. 2,195/- by the respondent was improper and contrary to the budgetary support scheme notification. The court determined that the petitioner was entitled to budgetary support calculated at 58% of central tax paid through cash ledger and 29% of IGST paid, after input tax credit utilization. The HC directed the respondent to release the inadmissible amount for the quarter January 2022 to March 2022, finding no justification for the partial claim rejection. Highlights GST Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:31 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87290