<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Time Limitation for Company Petition Upheld: Multiple OTS Letters and COVID Extension Validate Respondent&#039;s Filing Timeline</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87262</link>
    <description>NCLAT determined the time limitation for filing a company petition. The Respondent filed the petition on 12.08.2021, which was within the prescribed limitation period, considering multiple one-time settlement (OTS) letters extending the timeline and the Supreme Court&#039;s suo moto order extending limitation from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022. Despite multiple opportunities, the Appellant failed to contest the Respondent&#039;s submissions or provide contrary evidence. The Tribunal noted that limitation is a matter of both fact and law, which can be invoked at any stage. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal found no merit in the Appellant&#039;s challenge, consequently dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Time Limitation for Company Petition Upheld: Multiple OTS Letters and COVID Extension Validate Respondent&#039;s Filing Timeline</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87262</link>
      <description>NCLAT determined the time limitation for filing a company petition. The Respondent filed the petition on 12.08.2021, which was within the prescribed limitation period, considering multiple one-time settlement (OTS) letters extending the timeline and the Supreme Court&#039;s suo moto order extending limitation from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022. Despite multiple opportunities, the Appellant failed to contest the Respondent&#039;s submissions or provide contrary evidence. The Tribunal noted that limitation is a matter of both fact and law, which can be invoked at any stage. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal found no merit in the Appellant&#039;s challenge, consequently dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>