https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768539 The Appellate Tribunal for SAFEMA dismissed an appeal challenging provisional attachment orders under money laundering proceedings. The appellant challenged the attachment on grounds that no predicate offence existed, properties were acquired before the offence, and confirmation order exceeded 180 days. The Tribunal held that predicate offence existed at the time of ECIR recording, properties were acquired after the crime period, and confirmation order was passed within 180 days despite a subsequent corrigendum correcting typographical errors. The attachment was upheld as valid proceeds of crime. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Apr 2025 11:55:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768539 The Appellate Tribunal for SAFEMA dismissed an appeal challenging provisional attachment orders under money laundering proceedings. The appellant challenged the attachment on grounds that no predicate offence existed, properties were acquired before the offence, and confirmation order exceeded 180 days. The Tribunal held that predicate offence existed at the time of ECIR recording, properties were acquired after the crime period, and confirmation order was passed within 180 days despite a subsequent corrigendum correcting typographical errors. The attachment was upheld as valid proceeds of crime. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768539