<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 479 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768565</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan HC upheld the validity of a notice issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act based on WhatsApp chats discovered during search operations. The court found that WhatsApp communications between parties regarding property transactions, containing specific details of cash payments and unaccounted money for plot purchases, constituted corroborated documentary evidence. The chats revealed code language for unrecorded transactions, on-money payments, and cash components in property deals. Combined with digital data extraction, employee statements under Section 131, and specific transaction details, the court determined the evidence was not vague and satisfied Section 153C requirements. The petition challenging the notice was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 479 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768565</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan HC upheld the validity of a notice issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act based on WhatsApp chats discovered during search operations. The court found that WhatsApp communications between parties regarding property transactions, containing specific details of cash payments and unaccounted money for plot purchases, constituted corroborated documentary evidence. The chats revealed code language for unrecorded transactions, on-money payments, and cash components in property deals. Combined with digital data extraction, employee statements under Section 131, and specific transaction details, the court determined the evidence was not vague and satisfied Section 153C requirements. The petition challenging the notice was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>