<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 480 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768566</link>
    <description>Client assistant charges paid in the course of a brokerage business were treated as allowable business expenditure because the payment was actually incurred for business operations, and a third party&#039;s benefit from the arrangement did not make the expense inadmissible absent any legal prohibition. Unrealised loss on open futures and options positions was also treated as allowable, as a conservative provision connected with the business and not merely a disallowable notional loss. The commentary notes that the deductions were upheld on these principles and that no substantial question of law arose on the proposed issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 480 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768566</link>
      <description>Client assistant charges paid in the course of a brokerage business were treated as allowable business expenditure because the payment was actually incurred for business operations, and a third party&#039;s benefit from the arrangement did not make the expense inadmissible absent any legal prohibition. Unrealised loss on open futures and options positions was also treated as allowable, as a conservative provision connected with the business and not merely a disallowable notional loss. The commentary notes that the deductions were upheld on these principles and that no substantial question of law arose on the proposed issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>