<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 487 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768573</link>
    <description>HC ruled that impugned GST orders violated principles of natural justice by denying petitioner adequate opportunity to present their case. The court set aside the orders dated 23.08.2024 and 13.01.2025, directing respondent to reconsider the matter after providing a fair hearing and allowing submission of supporting documents. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness and consistent decision-making in administrative proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 487 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768573</link>
      <description>HC ruled that impugned GST orders violated principles of natural justice by denying petitioner adequate opportunity to present their case. The court set aside the orders dated 23.08.2024 and 13.01.2025, directing respondent to reconsider the matter after providing a fair hearing and allowing submission of supporting documents. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness and consistent decision-making in administrative proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>