<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 496 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768582</link>
    <description>GST treatment of an assignment of leasehold rights in land and the buildings on it was examined in relation to a lump sum transfer by a leaseholder to a third party. A prior Division Bench view of another High Court had treated such an assignment as a transfer of benefits arising from immovable property, outside the scope of supply under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act, read with Schedules II and III, and not liable under Section 9. As no contrary view was placed and connected matters on the same issue were pending, the Bombay High Court stayed the effect and implementation of the impugned adjudication order pending further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 496 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768582</link>
      <description>GST treatment of an assignment of leasehold rights in land and the buildings on it was examined in relation to a lump sum transfer by a leaseholder to a third party. A prior Division Bench view of another High Court had treated such an assignment as a transfer of benefits arising from immovable property, outside the scope of supply under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act, read with Schedules II and III, and not liable under Section 9. As no contrary view was placed and connected matters on the same issue were pending, the Bombay High Court stayed the effect and implementation of the impugned adjudication order pending further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>