<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 503 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768589</link>
    <description>J&amp;amp;K and Ladakh HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to rejection of budgetary support refund claims under the Budgetary Support Scheme. The court found that under Para 5 of the scheme, eligible manufacturing units are entitled to budgetary support calculated at 58% of central tax and 29% of IGST paid after input tax credit utilization. Respondent No. 3 incorrectly rejected claims of Rs. 31,456/- for July-September 2021 quarter and Rs. 69,684/- for January-March 2022 quarter without proper justification. The rejection was held contrary to notification dated 05.10.2017, and respondent was directed to release the inadmissible amounts. Petition disposed of favorably.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 503 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768589</link>
      <description>J&amp;amp;K and Ladakh HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to rejection of budgetary support refund claims under the Budgetary Support Scheme. The court found that under Para 5 of the scheme, eligible manufacturing units are entitled to budgetary support calculated at 58% of central tax and 29% of IGST paid after input tax credit utilization. Respondent No. 3 incorrectly rejected claims of Rs. 31,456/- for July-September 2021 quarter and Rs. 69,684/- for January-March 2022 quarter without proper justification. The rejection was held contrary to notification dated 05.10.2017, and respondent was directed to release the inadmissible amounts. Petition disposed of favorably.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>