<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 49 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42747</link>
    <description>Excise duty was held to attach on the date of removal of goods, not merely on the date of manufacture, where cartons were manufactured while exempt but cleared after a new levy came into force. Applying the scheme of the Act and Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, the SC concluded that the rate prevailing at clearance governed liability, so pre-levy stock cleared after the levy was chargeable to duty and the assessee&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:31:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 49 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42747</link>
      <description>Excise duty was held to attach on the date of removal of goods, not merely on the date of manufacture, where cartons were manufactured while exempt but cleared after a new levy came into force. Applying the scheme of the Act and Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, the SC concluded that the rate prevailing at clearance governed liability, so pre-levy stock cleared after the levy was chargeable to duty and the assessee&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>