<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1925 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461473</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the resolution plan approved by the CoC under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found no discrimination against the financial creditor and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in approving the plan. The resolution plan was deemed valid, with equitable treatment of all creditors, and no grounds were established to interfere with the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 18:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1925 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461473</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the resolution plan approved by the CoC under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found no discrimination against the financial creditor and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in approving the plan. The resolution plan was deemed valid, with equitable treatment of all creditors, and no grounds were established to interfere with the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>