<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42746</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the government&#039;s power to change duty rates, rejected the application of equitable estoppel, and imposed liability on the petitioner for duty payment, damages, and interest. It emphasized the importance of honoring legal obligations and legislative authority in matters of duty rates and importation contracts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42746</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the government&#039;s power to change duty rates, rejected the application of equitable estoppel, and imposed liability on the petitioner for duty payment, damages, and interest. It emphasized the importance of honoring legal obligations and legislative authority in matters of duty rates and importation contracts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>