https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461464 In this case, the SC affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that the defendant's actions constituted a breach of contract. The court determined that the plaintiff met the required elements of proof, demonstrating material breach and resulting damages. The decision established that unilateral contract modifications without mutual consent can be grounds for legal remedy, reinforcing contractual obligations and good faith performance principles. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:08:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461464 In this case, the SC affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that the defendant's actions constituted a breach of contract. The court determined that the plaintiff met the required elements of proof, demonstrating material breach and resulting damages. The decision established that unilateral contract modifications without mutual consent can be grounds for legal remedy, reinforcing contractual obligations and good faith performance principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461464