<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 57 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42734</link>
    <description>A customs classification dispute over competing tariff headings was treated as a matter for the statutory appellate hierarchy rather than initial writ jurisdiction. The court found no basis to interfere with the lower court&#039;s decision to relegate the party to the alternative appellate remedy, because the issue did not involve a jurisdictional defect warranting writ intervention. The text also notes that, where the appeal is pursued in the indicated time, delay before the appellate forum may be capable of condonation. The writ petition was therefore not entertained and the appellant was directed to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 57 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42734</link>
      <description>A customs classification dispute over competing tariff headings was treated as a matter for the statutory appellate hierarchy rather than initial writ jurisdiction. The court found no basis to interfere with the lower court&#039;s decision to relegate the party to the alternative appellate remedy, because the issue did not involve a jurisdictional defect warranting writ intervention. The text also notes that, where the appeal is pursued in the indicated time, delay before the appellate forum may be capable of condonation. The writ petition was therefore not entertained and the appellant was directed to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>