https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87215 HC adjudicated a case involving vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for an Independent Director. The Court held that mere designation as a Director is insufficient to establish criminal liability. The Complaint must explicitly demonstrate the specific role and responsibility of the Director in the company's affairs. In this instance, the Independent Director was neither a cheque signatory nor involved in financial decision-making, and had resigned prior to the incident. The Court emphasized that penal provisions creating vicarious liability must be strictly construed. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, quashing proceedings against the Independent Director due to lack of specific averments and evidence of direct involvement in the alleged offence. en-us Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:29:01 +0530 Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:29:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87215 HC adjudicated a case involving vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for an Independent Director. The Court held that mere designation as a Director is insufficient to establish criminal liability. The Complaint must explicitly demonstrate the specific role and responsibility of the Director in the company's affairs. In this instance, the Independent Director was neither a cheque signatory nor involved in financial decision-making, and had resigned prior to the incident. The Court emphasized that penal provisions creating vicarious liability must be strictly construed. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, quashing proceedings against the Independent Director due to lack of specific averments and evidence of direct involvement in the alleged offence. Highlights Indian Laws Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:29:01 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87215