<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 358 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768444</link>
    <description>SC determined that while the insurance company was liable under the policy for the factory shed collapse, the NCDRC incorrectly assessed compensation. The court found the NCDRC improperly relied on the respondent&#039;s surveyor report without allowing the appellant to contest it. The case was remitted for fresh determination of compensation quantum, emphasizing the need for independent evidence evaluation and fair hearing principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 358 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768444</link>
      <description>SC determined that while the insurance company was liable under the policy for the factory shed collapse, the NCDRC incorrectly assessed compensation. The court found the NCDRC improperly relied on the respondent&#039;s surveyor report without allowing the appellant to contest it. The case was remitted for fresh determination of compensation quantum, emphasizing the need for independent evidence evaluation and fair hearing principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>