<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42729</link>
    <description>Penalty for short-landing of goods must be computed by reference to the proved value of the short-landed item where a supplier&#039;s certificate supports that value and no material discredits it. The penalty imposed for Item No. 133 was treated as excessive because it exceeded the maximum amount calculable on the accepted valuation of Pipe No. 269. The penalty was consequently reduced to the maximum permissible amount based on that valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42729</link>
      <description>Penalty for short-landing of goods must be computed by reference to the proved value of the short-landed item where a supplier&#039;s certificate supports that value and no material discredits it. The penalty imposed for Item No. 133 was treated as excessive because it exceeded the maximum amount calculable on the accepted valuation of Pipe No. 269. The penalty was consequently reduced to the maximum permissible amount based on that valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>