<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 361 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768447</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal regarding reversal of CENVAT credit on capital goods removed as scrap under Rule 3(5A) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Following the precedent set by Principal Bench in Bharti Infratel Ltd., the tribunal held that capital goods cleared as scrap do not require payment under Rule 3(5A). The appellants were not liable for reversing CENVAT credit on capital goods removed as scrap. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 361 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768447</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal regarding reversal of CENVAT credit on capital goods removed as scrap under Rule 3(5A) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Following the precedent set by Principal Bench in Bharti Infratel Ltd., the tribunal held that capital goods cleared as scrap do not require payment under Rule 3(5A). The appellants were not liable for reversing CENVAT credit on capital goods removed as scrap. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>