<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768455</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed Revenue&#039;s writ appeals challenging CENVAT credit for capital goods used in captive power plant. Court held Revenue cannot improve their case beyond show cause notice contents during adjudication. The show cause notices alleged assessee used capital goods in co-generation plant producing exempted electricity. However, Revenue&#039;s case was limited to whether goods qualified as capital goods and credit eligibility, not requiring User Test Certificate. Applying SC precedents from Jawahar Mills and Rajasthan Spinning cases, adjudication cannot demand additional requirements not specified in original notices. Revenue&#039;s appeals failed as show cause notices could not be sustained on grounds originally cited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768455</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed Revenue&#039;s writ appeals challenging CENVAT credit for capital goods used in captive power plant. Court held Revenue cannot improve their case beyond show cause notice contents during adjudication. The show cause notices alleged assessee used capital goods in co-generation plant producing exempted electricity. However, Revenue&#039;s case was limited to whether goods qualified as capital goods and credit eligibility, not requiring User Test Certificate. Applying SC precedents from Jawahar Mills and Rajasthan Spinning cases, adjudication cannot demand additional requirements not specified in original notices. Revenue&#039;s appeals failed as show cause notices could not be sustained on grounds originally cited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>