<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42728</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order issuing process against the Petitioner in a criminal case for violating the Customs Act, 1962. Despite a retracted confession by a co-accused, the lack of independent evidence led to the exoneration of the Petitioner by the Additional Collector of Customs. The court emphasized the insufficiency of evidence and the abuse of legal process, ruling in favor of the Petitioner and highlighting the necessity to uphold the ends of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42728</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order issuing process against the Petitioner in a criminal case for violating the Customs Act, 1962. Despite a retracted confession by a co-accused, the lack of independent evidence led to the exoneration of the Petitioner by the Additional Collector of Customs. The court emphasized the insufficiency of evidence and the abuse of legal process, ruling in favor of the Petitioner and highlighting the necessity to uphold the ends of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>