<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42727</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the respondent&#039;s actions in adjudication proceedings, including not addressing the petitioners&#039; requests for relevant documents and witnesses, and proceeding ex parte without considering their representations, violated principles of natural justice. The Court quashed the adverse orders and directed the respondent to reinitiate proceedings, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment and providing a reasonable opportunity for the petitioners to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:52:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42727</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the respondent&#039;s actions in adjudication proceedings, including not addressing the petitioners&#039; requests for relevant documents and witnesses, and proceeding ex parte without considering their representations, violated principles of natural justice. The Court quashed the adverse orders and directed the respondent to reinitiate proceedings, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment and providing a reasonable opportunity for the petitioners to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>