<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 384 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768470</link>
    <description>ITAT Indore allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding reopening of assessment under section 147 for unexplained cash credit under section 68. The tribunal found that the assessee discharged its primary onus by proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of loan transaction with creditor company &quot;J&quot;. The creditor was an active company filing regular returns and claiming substantial TDS credits. Revenue authorities failed to controvert documentary evidence beyond general remarks about shell company operations. ITAT had previously deleted similar additions in other cases involving the same creditor. The loan was repaid immediately after the financial year ended, supporting the assessee&#039;s position. The addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 384 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768470</link>
      <description>ITAT Indore allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding reopening of assessment under section 147 for unexplained cash credit under section 68. The tribunal found that the assessee discharged its primary onus by proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of loan transaction with creditor company &quot;J&quot;. The creditor was an active company filing regular returns and claiming substantial TDS credits. Revenue authorities failed to controvert documentary evidence beyond general remarks about shell company operations. ITAT had previously deleted similar additions in other cases involving the same creditor. The loan was repaid immediately after the financial year ended, supporting the assessee&#039;s position. The addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>