<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 387 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768473</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur upheld the TPO&#039;s transfer pricing adjustments for international transactions between the assessee and its associate enterprise. The tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s contention that royalty payments should be benchmarked collectively with manufacturing activities, finding them to be separate transactions. The DRP&#039;s findings on method selection were deemed adequate, and the TNMM method applied by TPO was validated. The tribunal also rejected the assessee&#039;s request to introduce additional evidence regarding royalty agreements, finding no substantial cause for allowing such evidence. The assessment regarding raw material purchases and royalty payments to the associate enterprise was upheld in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 387 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768473</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur upheld the TPO&#039;s transfer pricing adjustments for international transactions between the assessee and its associate enterprise. The tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s contention that royalty payments should be benchmarked collectively with manufacturing activities, finding them to be separate transactions. The DRP&#039;s findings on method selection were deemed adequate, and the TNMM method applied by TPO was validated. The tribunal also rejected the assessee&#039;s request to introduce additional evidence regarding royalty agreements, finding no substantial cause for allowing such evidence. The assessment regarding raw material purchases and royalty payments to the associate enterprise was upheld in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>