<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 400 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768486</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that compensation received by an assessee upon employment termination constitutes a capital receipt and is not taxable under section 17(3). Following precedents in Prasad Vijaykumar Kulkarni and Atul Shashikant Garbhe cases, the Tribunal ruled that ex-gratia payments are capital in nature and cannot be included in taxable income. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 400 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768486</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that compensation received by an assessee upon employment termination constitutes a capital receipt and is not taxable under section 17(3). Following precedents in Prasad Vijaykumar Kulkarni and Atul Shashikant Garbhe cases, the Tribunal ruled that ex-gratia payments are capital in nature and cannot be included in taxable income. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>