<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 422 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768508</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the refund rejection unjustified. The court determined that the business was operating from its principal place, the appellate authority had specified the refund amount, and directed the respondent to process the refund. The petitioner was instructed to file a fresh refund application on the official portal to complete the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:29:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 422 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768508</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the refund rejection unjustified. The court determined that the business was operating from its principal place, the appellate authority had specified the refund amount, and directed the respondent to process the refund. The petitioner was instructed to file a fresh refund application on the official portal to complete the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>