https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42720 Amendment of a writ petition to bring on record subsequent developments was permitted where the later Tribunal order directing deposit of redemption fine was relevant to the issues to be examined at final hearing. The Court accepted that the petitioners had already furnished a bank guarantee under an interim order, and held that objections based on alleged lack of necessity and delay did not justify refusal of the amendment. The chamber summons was accordingly allowed, and the petitioners were granted time to carry out the amendments within four weeks. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:28:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42720 Amendment of a writ petition to bring on record subsequent developments was permitted where the later Tribunal order directing deposit of redemption fine was relevant to the issues to be examined at final hearing. The Court accepted that the petitioners had already furnished a bank guarantee under an interim order, and held that objections based on alleged lack of necessity and delay did not justify refusal of the amendment. The chamber summons was accordingly allowed, and the petitioners were granted time to carry out the amendments within four weeks. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42720