<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42718</link>
    <description>The court held that the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate without notice to the petitioner was unsustainable and lacked the opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The petition was allowed, setting aside the order dated 25th April 1989. The court directed a fresh consideration of the Customs Department&#039;s application under Section 110 (1-A) of the Customs Act with notice to the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:22:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42718</link>
      <description>The court held that the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate without notice to the petitioner was unsustainable and lacked the opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The petition was allowed, setting aside the order dated 25th April 1989. The court directed a fresh consideration of the Customs Department&#039;s application under Section 110 (1-A) of the Customs Act with notice to the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>