<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768431</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes in a rectification application under section 154 involving additions for differences in import purchase and custom duty with respect to CBEC and VAT returns. The tribunal found that CIT(A) dismissed the appeal without considering materials filed during assessment proceedings and failed to provide adequate opportunity or virtual hearing as requested. The matter was remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after examining all materials and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 19:03:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768431</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes in a rectification application under section 154 involving additions for differences in import purchase and custom duty with respect to CBEC and VAT returns. The tribunal found that CIT(A) dismissed the appeal without considering materials filed during assessment proceedings and failed to provide adequate opportunity or virtual hearing as requested. The matter was remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after examining all materials and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>