https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461446 An appellate court may reverse an acquittal only if the trial court's view is perverse, rests on misreading or omission of material evidence, or no reasonable alternative view is possible. Liability under Section 34 IPC requires proof of prior meeting of minds, pre-planning, and participation in the criminal act in furtherance of the common intention. On the evidence, mere presence of the appellants in the same vehicle was insufficient to establish shared common intention with the principal accused. The reversal of acquittal was therefore unjustified, and the trial court's acquittal stood restored. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2026 18:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461446 An appellate court may reverse an acquittal only if the trial court's view is perverse, rests on misreading or omission of material evidence, or no reasonable alternative view is possible. Liability under Section 34 IPC requires proof of prior meeting of minds, pre-planning, and participation in the criminal act in furtherance of the common intention. On the evidence, mere presence of the appellants in the same vehicle was insufficient to establish shared common intention with the principal accused. The reversal of acquittal was therefore unjustified, and the trial court's acquittal stood restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461446