<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461447</link>
    <description>Liquidated damages were held not to fall within the taxable service contemplated by section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. Following an earlier Tribunal decision on the same point, the demand of service tax on liquidated damages was found unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 19:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461447</link>
      <description>Liquidated damages were held not to fall within the taxable service contemplated by section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. Following an earlier Tribunal decision on the same point, the demand of service tax on liquidated damages was found unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>