<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1429 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461450</link>
    <description>In a PMLA bail assessment, the Chhattisgarh HC applied the Section 45 twin conditions and examined whether there were reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was not guilty and unlikely to reoffend on bail. On the broad probabilities available at the bail stage, the applicant&#039;s travel to Dubai, meetings with the principal accused, bank transactions said to route proceeds of crime, and alleged property acquisition in his wife&#039;s name were treated as prima facie links to laundering activity. The Court found the material sufficient at this stage to show involvement and that the statutory threshold for regular bail was not satisfied, so bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 19:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1429 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461450</link>
      <description>In a PMLA bail assessment, the Chhattisgarh HC applied the Section 45 twin conditions and examined whether there were reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was not guilty and unlikely to reoffend on bail. On the broad probabilities available at the bail stage, the applicant&#039;s travel to Dubai, meetings with the principal accused, bank transactions said to route proceeds of crime, and alleged property acquisition in his wife&#039;s name were treated as prima facie links to laundering activity. The Court found the material sufficient at this stage to show involvement and that the statutory threshold for regular bail was not satisfied, so bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>