https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42709 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging Notifications on duty of custom and countervailing duty, ruling that the petitioners failed to prove prejudice as alleged. The Rule was discharged, interim orders vacated, and respondents allowed to enforce the bank guarantee for dues recovery. The judgment emphasized the necessity of demonstrating prejudice for promissory estoppel claims and the Government's right to issue notifications in revenue matters. It clarified that challenging notifications requires proving adverse effects from reliance on promises and disallowed undue enrichment. The decision highlighted the importance of establishing actual harm to succeed in claims against governmental actions. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:53:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42709 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging Notifications on duty of custom and countervailing duty, ruling that the petitioners failed to prove prejudice as alleged. The Rule was discharged, interim orders vacated, and respondents allowed to enforce the bank guarantee for dues recovery. The judgment emphasized the necessity of demonstrating prejudice for promissory estoppel claims and the Government's right to issue notifications in revenue matters. It clarified that challenging notifications requires proving adverse effects from reliance on promises and disallowed undue enrichment. The decision highlighted the importance of establishing actual harm to succeed in claims against governmental actions. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 25 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42709