https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42708 A preventive detention order under the COFEPOSA Act was held vitiated where the English and Gurmukhi versions of the order and the grounds of detention materially differed. The mismatch between the stated basis for detention and the recorded grounds created confusion about whether the alleged conduct involved smuggling, concealment, transportation, or dealing in smuggled goods. That inconsistency was found to have impaired the detenu's constitutional right under Article 22(5) to make an effective representation, and the order was liable to be quashed. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42708 A preventive detention order under the COFEPOSA Act was held vitiated where the English and Gurmukhi versions of the order and the grounds of detention materially differed. The mismatch between the stated basis for detention and the recorded grounds created confusion about whether the alleged conduct involved smuggling, concealment, transportation, or dealing in smuggled goods. That inconsistency was found to have impaired the detenu's constitutional right under Article 22(5) to make an effective representation, and the order was liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42708