<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 935 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461441</link>
    <description>A light motor vehicle licence does not, by itself, authorise driving a transport or goods carriage vehicle; specific entitlement is required under the Motor Vehicles Act scheme. Where the evidence showed that the driver held only an LMV licence and the vehicle was a goods vehicle, the breach of the insurance condition was treated as established. The insurer was nevertheless directed, in exercise of constitutional powers, to satisfy the balance award amount and was given liberty to recover it from the owner and driver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 14:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 935 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461441</link>
      <description>A light motor vehicle licence does not, by itself, authorise driving a transport or goods carriage vehicle; specific entitlement is required under the Motor Vehicles Act scheme. Where the evidence showed that the driver held only an LMV licence and the vehicle was a goods vehicle, the breach of the insurance condition was treated as established. The insurer was nevertheless directed, in exercise of constitutional powers, to satisfy the balance award amount and was given liberty to recover it from the owner and driver.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>