<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1444 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461438</link>
    <description>Assessment proceedings violated the principle of natural justice by failing to grant a personal hearing after the taxpayer filed required details; consequence: the assessment order is set aside and remitted for fresh consideration with a personal hearing. On tax rate for unexplained cash additions, the increased punitive rate is held applicable only for transactions from the stated cut off date onward, not prior transactions; consequence: pre cut off additions may attract the earlier, lower rate. The assessment failed to compare collections with the prior year despite the taxpayer&#039;s request; consequence: the respondent must compare earlier statements when reassessing within 12 weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1444 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461438</link>
      <description>Assessment proceedings violated the principle of natural justice by failing to grant a personal hearing after the taxpayer filed required details; consequence: the assessment order is set aside and remitted for fresh consideration with a personal hearing. On tax rate for unexplained cash additions, the increased punitive rate is held applicable only for transactions from the stated cut off date onward, not prior transactions; consequence: pre cut off additions may attract the earlier, lower rate. The assessment failed to compare collections with the prior year despite the taxpayer&#039;s request; consequence: the respondent must compare earlier statements when reassessing within 12 weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>