https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461439 Interlinked GST show cause notices should not be disposed of separately when an earlier notice remains pending adjudication. The Madras HC noted that the later notices and the order dated 02.08.2023 arose from connected proceedings, so a common hearing and composite order were required. It directed recall of the independent orders passed in the interregnum and required the respondent to hear the petitioner and pass a suitable common order covering the earlier notice, the impugned notices, and the related orders. en-us Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 May 2025 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461439 Interlinked GST show cause notices should not be disposed of separately when an earlier notice remains pending adjudication. The Madras HC noted that the later notices and the order dated 02.08.2023 arose from connected proceedings, so a common hearing and composite order were required. It directed recall of the independent orders passed in the interregnum and required the respondent to hear the petitioner and pass a suitable common order covering the earlier notice, the impugned notices, and the related orders. Case-Laws GST Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461439