<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>INADVERTENT ERROR IN MENTIONING THE CORRECT FIGURE IN A CHEQUE CANNOT BE A GROUND TO DISCHARGE THE ACCUSED</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14044</link>
    <description>A signed cheque gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that it discharged a liability; inadvertent discrepancies between figures and words or overwriting of the date do not necessarily invalidate the cheque where the bank return memo and the statutory demand notice consistently indicate the intended amount. The demand notice must specify the cheque amount with sufficient clarity, and omnibus or non-specific notices may be defective. Disputes over material interpolation, intended amount, or notice adequacy are triable questions to be resolved by evidence rather than by premature dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 08:35:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 08:35:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=812287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>INADVERTENT ERROR IN MENTIONING THE CORRECT FIGURE IN A CHEQUE CANNOT BE A GROUND TO DISCHARGE THE ACCUSED</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14044</link>
      <description>A signed cheque gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that it discharged a liability; inadvertent discrepancies between figures and words or overwriting of the date do not necessarily invalidate the cheque where the bank return memo and the statutory demand notice consistently indicate the intended amount. The demand notice must specify the cheque amount with sufficient clarity, and omnibus or non-specific notices may be defective. Disputes over material interpolation, intended amount, or notice adequacy are triable questions to be resolved by evidence rather than by premature dismissal.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 08:35:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>