https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42697 Unexplained delay and laches barred the writ challenge to a Tribunal classification order under Article 226, so the Court declined to reopen the concluded dispute. The earlier classification had attained finality, and the later show cause notice and demand order were treated as consequential to that determination. As the notice also disclosed an available statutory appeal under Section 35-B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the Court refused to interfere in writ jurisdiction. The petition was therefore dismissed in limine, with the impugned demand proceedings left to the appellate remedy. en-us Wed, 18 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42697 Unexplained delay and laches barred the writ challenge to a Tribunal classification order under Article 226, so the Court declined to reopen the concluded dispute. The earlier classification had attained finality, and the later show cause notice and demand order were treated as consequential to that determination. As the notice also disclosed an available statutory appeal under Section 35-B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the Court refused to interfere in writ jurisdiction. The petition was therefore dismissed in limine, with the impugned demand proceedings left to the appellate remedy. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42697