<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42693</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the challenge to the customs duty order as it merged in the appellate tribunal decision. It ruled that Respondent No. 4 had no legal right to withhold earnest money and must refund it, emphasizing the lack of a general lien. The court did not decide on the short-levy duty issue but made the petition absolute in favor of the petitioners, ordering the return of the amount with interest. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42693</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the challenge to the customs duty order as it merged in the appellate tribunal decision. It ruled that Respondent No. 4 had no legal right to withhold earnest money and must refund it, emphasizing the lack of a general lien. The court did not decide on the short-levy duty issue but made the petition absolute in favor of the petitioners, ordering the return of the amount with interest. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>