https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42685 A writ seeking to restrain authorities from using statements recorded under the Customs Act in proposed Customs Act and COFEPOSA proceedings was held premature. Preventive detention under COFEPOSA was treated as distinct from punitive customs action, so objections on reliability, retraction, or admissibility of statements were not a basis for advance judicial restraint. Those issues were directed to be raised in the appropriate forum at adjudication, prosecution, or in proceedings arising from any detention order. The Court declined to grant a blanket injunction preventing action under another enactment on the basis of the same statements. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:31:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42685 A writ seeking to restrain authorities from using statements recorded under the Customs Act in proposed Customs Act and COFEPOSA proceedings was held premature. Preventive detention under COFEPOSA was treated as distinct from punitive customs action, so objections on reliability, retraction, or admissibility of statements were not a basis for advance judicial restraint. Those issues were directed to be raised in the appropriate forum at adjudication, prosecution, or in proceedings arising from any detention order. The Court declined to grant a blanket injunction preventing action under another enactment on the basis of the same statements. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42685