https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42682 A High Court exercising writ jurisdiction may, where circumstances justify, modify a tribunal-imposed pre-deposit condition for prosecuting an appeal. Here, the court accepted that financial hardship had been considered and permitted the cash deposit requirement to be replaced by a bank guarantee in the agreed format, to remain alive until disposal of the appeal. It also preserved the tribunal's power to enforce compliance, including dismissal of the appeal if the guarantee was not furnished or the fallback cash deposit was not made within time. en-us Fri, 22 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:23:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42682 A High Court exercising writ jurisdiction may, where circumstances justify, modify a tribunal-imposed pre-deposit condition for prosecuting an appeal. Here, the court accepted that financial hardship had been considered and permitted the cash deposit requirement to be replaced by a bank guarantee in the agreed format, to remain alive until disposal of the appeal. It also preserved the tribunal's power to enforce compliance, including dismissal of the appeal if the guarantee was not furnished or the fallback cash deposit was not made within time. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42682